The Scoop: Nike admits misstep, replaces running ad after Boston Marathon backlash

Plus: Incoming Apple CEO leans on connection to Steve Jobs; Trump tells companies they’ll be ‘remembered’ for not taking tariff refunds.

Nike is taking heat after a running ad in Boston didn’t land for everyone.

The company put up a large window sign at one of its stores ahead of the Boston Marathon that read: “Runners welcome. Walkers tolerated,” according to Boston.com.

The message was meant to get race crowds jazzed up for the event, but it quickly backfired and drew criticism online. Runners, including one adaptive athlete, said the wording felt exclusionary and dismissive of people who walk during races due to strategy, fatigue or disability.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Robyn Michaud | North Star Woman (@giiwedinanang_kwe)

Nike pulled the sign within days and acknowledged the mistake, saying the message “missed the mark.”

“We want more people to feel welcome in running—no matter their pace, experience, or the distance. During race week in Boston, we put up a series of signs to encourage runners,” Nike said in a statement to Runner’s World. “One of them missed the mark. We took it down, and we’ll use this moment to do better and continue showing up for all runners.”

At the store location, a new ad appeared: “Boston will always remind you, movement is what matters.”

Down the street, Asics took advantage of Nike’s blunder with an ad that says, “Runners. Walkers. All welcome.”

Why it matters: Boston Marathon week is not the moment for a sarcastic tone. It’s a highly emotional, inclusive event with deep personal meaning for participants. What might read as cheeky in another space lands as tone-deaf here. Timing and environment definitely shape how messages are received.

Nike will happily sell shoes to walkers, but when people see the word “tolerated,” it can automatically leave customers feeling less than or left out. It’s an example of how brand language defines who belongs. Or in this case, who doesn’t belong.

Companies should also be thinking about how social amplification will help or hurt. Despite this being a single sign at one location, it was shared across social media hundreds of times and drew negative headlines, turning into national news. If something is public facing, assume it will travel, for better or worse.

With all that said, Nike did the right thing. It released a simple but clear statement that admitted the blunder and apologized. They removed the sign and replaced it with a line that acknowledged the import of the marathon. They leaned into inclusivity and reiterated everyone is welcome.

Nike will survive this, but it’s a reminder for PR teams that good intentions don’t shape public perception. Think about how your messages will land with your audience before you’re left scrambling to repair the damage.

Editor’s Top Reads:

• Longtime Apple CEO Tim Cook announced this week he is stepping down, paving the way for John Ternus, Apple’s senior VP of hardware engineering, to lead. In a press release, Apple said Cook will stay on as executive chairman, helping Ternus take the reins by September. “John Ternus has the mind of an engineer, the soul of an innovator, and the heart to lead with integrity and with honor. He is a visionary whose contributions to Apple over 25 years are already too numerous to count, and he is without question the right person to lead Apple into the future,” Cook said in the release. Ternus emphasized his longevity with the company and connected his experience to Apple founder Steve Jobs. He said: “Having spent almost my entire career at Apple, I have been lucky to have worked under Steve Jobs and to have had Tim Cook as my mentor. It has been a privilege to help shape the products and experiences that have changed so much of how we interact with the world and with one another. I am filled with optimism about what we can achieve in the years to come…” Apple stock dropped slightly,  just over 1%, after the announcement. Ternus has big shoes to fill and leaning into his longevity and experience under Jobs and Cook can help soothe any stakeholder unease. He also emphasizes humility and appreciation rather than a vision or plan, but he’s likely trying to show more continuity than anything at this point. His statement doesn’t yet build a strong identity for him as CEO, so the next communication will need to shift from gratitude and legacy to clear direction.
• S. Customs and Border Protection said companies can now file for refunds from IEEPA tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and ruled illegal by the Supreme Court. Companies like FedEx and UPS have already begun the process. CNBC reports that shortly after CBP made the announcement, Trump said he “would remember” companies that chose not to seek a refund. “Brilliant if they don’t do that,” he told Squawk Box. Companies have largely been toeing the line in terms of how they speak about Trump’s policies, many staying silent or offering neutral statements to avoid being publicly criticized. This is no different. While some organizations made it clear early they’d be seeking to recoup losses from major price hikes on imports, like Amazon and Gap, others might take a more muted approach to avoid becoming politically entangled. This understandably puts companies between a rock and a hard place. If they don’t seek a refund, their audience might think they’re trying to gain political favor. If they do, they’re less likely to be talking openly about it. Staying low and away from headlines is the strategy here.
• FIFA has been saying there is “unprecedented demand” for the 2026 World Cup and has priced tickets accordingly, often raising prices significantly, The Athletic But for a major event, the U.S. men’s team’s opening match vs. Paraguay at SoFi Stadium, the numbers tell a very different story. As of early April, only about 41,000 tickets had been sold for a stadium that holds roughly 70,000 for the World Cup. FIFA insists that ticket sales will pick up closer to the event, but online, prices have been pushing fans away and some have filed a formal complaint against the organization over its pricing structure. Instead of acknowledging the issue, FIFA has released more, higher-priced tickets, the outlet said. There’s a gap here between what the organization is saying and what people expect. This is something that could damage FIFA’s credibility, particularly during a time of economic uncertainty. This is about understanding the current climate and listening to the audience. Will this stop people from watching? No, not entirely. But there is a clear impact and the overall perception could leave FIFA trying to rebuild trust when it’s a bit late.

Courtney Blackann is a communications reporter. Connect with her on LinkedIn or email her at courtneyb@ragan.com.

The post The Scoop: Nike admits misstep, replaces running ad after Boston Marathon backlash appeared first on PR Daily.

Source_link